Jürgen Basedow Should Different Types of Methodology in Comparative Legal Research Be Combined into One Method?
© Maximilian Dörrbecker
Max Planck Society
"The Max Planck Society is Germany's most successful research organization. Since its establishment in 1948, no fewer than 18 Nobel laureates have emerged from the ranks of its scientists, putting it on a par with the best and most prestigious research institutions worldwide. The more than 15,000 publications each year in internationally renowned scientific journals are proof of the outstanding research work conducted at Max Planck Institutes – and many of those articles are among the most-cited publications in the relevant field." (Source)
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
"The Institute is dedicated to foundational research in the fields of European and international private law, commercial law, economic law and civil procedure. The goal of its research activities is to study how various legal systems address cases and conflicts which arise in the context of private law broadly conceived. Legal systems from throughout the world are thus analysed and scrutinised in respect of their differences, similarities and mutual influences. Simultaneously, areas of potential harmonisation are explored. Europe is growing together. The social and economic exchange between all corners of the world is expanding. Legislatures, judges, citizens and businesses are increasingly confronted with legal questions that can no longer be solved at the purely national level. Accordingly, within the framework of its areas of specialisation, one of the essential tasks of the Institute is to address the challenges arising from the integration and the internationalisation of economic, social and legal relations." (Source)
Comparative law, an important legal method, is becoming ever more relevant in a globalized world. Different methods exist in comparative legal research despite the effort of the discipline to combine them. Whereas the so-called functionalists only look at the written law, the “law as culture”-approach demands for taking into consideration also the surrounding factors and conditions such as religion, society or economic situation. Another dispute exists between the micro comparative research, which concentrates on single elements and the macro comparative research considering whole legal systems. JÜRGEN BASEDOW has collected long-time experience regarding comparative law and concludes that the one method is unrealistic, yet not even helpful. In this video he explains why it is rather useful to accept the coexistence of different methodologies, which can be applied depending on the examined problem, its background and the goal of its analysis.
LT Video Publication DOI: https://doi.org/10.21036/LTPUB10300
Comparative Law and its Clients
- Jürgen Basedow
- American Journal of Comparative Law
- Published in 2014